A breach of duty occurs when someone fails to exercise the level of care a reasonable person would in the same situation, causing harm to another person. In Nevada, breach of duty is one of four elements required to prove negligence in a personal injury claim. The others are duty of care, causation, and damages.
To succeed in a claim, you must show that the person who hurt you owed you a duty of care, that they failed to meet that standard, that their failure directly caused your injuries, and that you suffered real losses as a result.
Nevada courts apply the reasonable person standard when evaluating breach of duty, asking whether the defendant’s conduct fell below what an ordinary, prudent person would have done, not whether they intended to cause harm. That standard comes from Nevada common law, developed through decades of court decisions. The broader right to recover damages for such conduct is codified under NRS § 41.130.
Breaches of duty show up in everyday situations more often than most people realize. Nearly every personal injury case involves some form of negligent behavior that a reasonable person would have avoided:
Proving a breach requires showing that the defendant’s conduct fell short of what a reasonable person would have done under similar circumstances. A solid case is built on a combination of physical evidence, testimony, and documented records.
The stronger the evidence tying the defendant’s behavior to the harm you suffered, the harder it becomes for the other side to deny responsibility. Gathering that evidence early, before it disappears or degrades, is one of the most important steps in protecting your claim.
In some cases, you do not need to prove what a reasonable person would have done because the defendant violated an existing law. Nevada recognizes negligence per se, meaning that breaking a statute intended to protect the public, such as a traffic law or building code, establishes a breach of duty. You must still prove causation and damages, but the violation largely satisfies the breach element.
Common carriers, such as bus companies, taxi services, and commercial airlines, are held to a higher standard of care than ordinary individuals. Because passengers place their safety entirely in the carrier’s hands, Nevada law requires these operators to exercise the highest degree of care when transporting people.
Intent doesn’t matter in a negligence claim. You don’t need to prove that someone meant to hurt you, only that they failed to act with reasonable care and that failure led to your injuries. A distracted driver doesn’t intend to cause a collision, but the carelessness behind the wheel still constitutes a breach of duty.
Not necessarily. Proving a breach is a significant step, but insurance companies and defense attorneys will still challenge causation and damages. Even with clear evidence of negligent conduct, the strength of your overall case depends on how well every element is documented and presented.
Once a breach is established, the focus shifts to connecting that breach to the harm you suffered and calculating the full value of your losses. The value of your claim depends on the severity of your injuries, the strength of the evidence, and how clearly the breach can be tied to your damages. Nevada allows you to seek compensation for the following:
Have you been injured because someone else failed to meet their basic responsibility to act safely? You do not have to figure this out alone. Our personal injury attorneys at Hanratty Law Group are ready to give you honest answers about your claim.
Call us at (725) 223-0279 or complete our online form to schedule your free consultation. You focus on your recovery, we will thoroughly investigate the circumstances of your injury, identify every liable party, and pursue the maximum compensation available.